T O P I C R E V I E W |
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 03:17:56 just to show off my new sig really will do a better one when i learn the software better, so what do you think and is this acceptable?
mod edit signature to big, have a look at this thread http://www.thecornsnake.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15428 |
11 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 17:51:32 thanks guys |
gmac |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 15:45:26 quote: Originally posted by Only1Nitro
sig is now downsized via photo bucket it is now definatly smaller than required sorry about that
was over 1000 wide originally that's why it was switched off.
and is good looking sig
|
Kehhlyr |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 13:45:44 All sorted now though. Looks good as well. |
Ailsa |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 12:31:00 nice pics on your sig, it took me ages to sort the size of mine but thats just because am a bit rusty with photo editing |
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 11:08:10 sig is now downsized via photo bucket it is now definatly smaller than required sorry about that |
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 11:04:00 strange will downsize more but iv got it showing whats stated above
|
ptmbradley |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 10:52:51 I saved your sig to my desktop, and checking the properties on the file it tells me your image is 1020x231...
Mine is 640x200 just for reference. |
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 10:46:20 iv just checked again its size is exactly 543.19 x 123.03 which is smaller than 800 x 300
|
Only1Nitro |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 10:33:55 it was smaller than specified can i have a proper explanation please? |
reptiledanny |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 10:27:11 wow it looks amazing, how did you get that invisable sig |
a33272 |
Posted - 30/04/2011 : 09:53:35 Hahahaha. Ummm I think that's a no by the mods |